The Art of Fashion Photography (Part 1) - Featuring Abigail Spenser Hu
In this vlog (the first of two parts), I got to shoot with artist, designer, and influencer Abigail Spenser Hu. Our photoshoot took place in and around Los Angeles County Museum of Art which was the perfect inspirational canvas for our artistic collaboration.
If you saw my last vlog you will appreciate how the harsh light in Los Angeles can be a real challenge for photography, from both a technical and comfort standpoint. For example, at times it was a challenge for Abigail to keep her eyes open and as the temperature rose quickly (it reached 93!) it was important to rest and stay hydrated. Despite this Abigail kept up her energy and did an amazing job modeling the latest Fall fashions she'd prepared from designer labels such as Gucci - so a big thank you to her!
This is Part 1 of our Art of Fashion Photography collaboration and Part 2 will be available next week. If you want to see more of Abigail then check out my full Q&A interview with her using this link... Q&A with Abigail Spenser Hu
Like/Follow and see more from Abigail...
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/abigailspenserhu/
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/abigail.spenser
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/AbigailSpenserHu
WEBSITE: http://www.abigailspenserhu.com/
Abigail's wardrobe...
Outfit #1 - Dior
Outfit #2 - Head to toe Gucci
Music by Kevin Pastries - 'Colla Ghree' and 'Around'
AS ALWAYS, I WOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL IF YOU COULD SMASH SUBSCRIBE, HIT THE BELL, AND GIVE THIS A BIG THUMBS UP TO LET GOOGLE'S MYSTERIOUS ALGORITHM KNOW TO SHARE MY VLOGS MORE BROADLY WHICH WILL HELP GROW THE CHANNEL.
If you have any questions then please drop a comment below and/or message me directly.
I'm always on the lookout for new people to collaborate with so contact me if you'd like to be next!
Like/Follow and see more from me....
INSTAGRAM:: @radical_snaps
TIKTOK:: @radicalsnaps
TWITTER:: @radicalsnaps
FACEBOOK:: @radicalsnaps
YOUTUBE:: RadicalSnaps
WEBSITE: www.radicalsnaps.com
EQUIPMENT USED*::
Camera - Canon 5D markiii
Lens #1 - Canon 24-70mm F2.8
Lens #2 - Canon 80mm F1.8
Flash - Canon 600EX and Canon 430EXII speedlites
Gimball - Smove
Flash Diffuser - Fotodiox
EDITING*::
Photography - I used Photoshop CS6 for enhancements, eg. to add vignettes, refine exposure/contrast/saturation
Video - I used iMovie on my iMac
*I'm not sponsored and I don't receive compensation from any of the companies listed above (I wish I was!)
Comments
===================================
Start with the basics
Are Launchpad Revenues Predictable? is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how crypto market cycles influence transaction demand. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk dot fun or stonk revenue, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine how crypto market cycles influence transaction demand. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Time frames matter. A single active day can dominate a weekly average, while a cumulative figure keeps growing as historical activity accumulates. Analysts should label every number with its period and avoid extrapolating a brief surge into an annual guarantee.
Why the detail matters
An often overlooked aspect is launch frequency and trading volume can vary sharply between periods. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Fee allocation can vary by launch mode and stage of a market. The stated creator share on one screen is not automatically a universal commission across every product or every date. Traders should look for current documentation and distinguish illustrative examples from guaranteed payments.
Risks and limitations
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on past fee generation is not a dependable projection. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Neither high protocol revenue nor token burns by themselves establish that a token is underpriced. Financial claims should connect an observable mechanism to a carefully limited conclusion, rather than leap from activity to a promised return.
Putting it together
For a grounded assessment, Launch frequency and trading volume can vary sharply between periods. At the same time, past fee generation is not a dependable projection. A search for stronkfun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
====================================================
A closer look
Liquidity and Price Movement in Newly Launched Coins is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on why shallow pools can magnify small transactions. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonfun or stonckfun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is why shallow pools can magnify small transactions. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Burning tokens refers to removing units from usable circulation according to the relevant mechanism. A burn is observable supply-side activity, not a promise that demand will rise. Market outcomes also depend on liquidity, sentiment, competition and broader crypto conditions.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind slippage increases when trade size is large compared with available liquidity. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
Implications for users
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on slippage increases when trade size is large compared with available liquidity. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Coins created by independent users should be evaluated individually. Sharing a launch venue does not mean sharing the same team, contract settings, liquidity depth or risk profile. A platform token, meanwhile, has a different narrative and should not be conflated with every coin appearing in the discovery feed.
Important distinctions
To understand liquidity and price movement in newly launched coins, begin with visible trading activity does not guarantee easy exits. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Quote-token volatility adds a second layer to the analysis. If a new coin is paired with an asset whose own dollar price changes, its dollar-denominated chart can move for reasons unrelated to new demand for that coin. This is why the denominator of a displayed price should never be ignored.
Closing observations
For a grounded assessment, Slippage increases when trade size is large compared with available liquidity. At the same time, visible trading activity does not guarantee easy exits. A search for stonks fun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
